Broadcom, Ericsson, NEC, Nokia, Panasonic Mobile Communications
and Texas Instruments have each filed Complaints to the European
Commission requesting that it investigate and stop Qualcomm's
anti-competitive conduct in the licensing of essential patents for
3G mobile technology. The companies state that Qualcomm is
violating EU competition law and failing to meet the commitments
Qualcomm made to international standard bodies around the world
that it would license its technology on fair, reasonable and
non-discriminatory terms. Absent these commitments, the WCDMA 3G
standard would not have been adopted. Qualcomm is infringing these
rules by:
- trying to exclude competing manufacturers of chipsets for
mobile phones from the market and preventing others from entering.
To this end, Qualcomm has committed a number of abuses, ranging
from the refusal to licence essential patents to potential chipset
competitors on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms to
offering lower royalty rates to handset customers who buy chipsets
exclusively from Qualcomm.
- charging royalties for its WCDMA essential patents that are
excessive and disproportionate; in particular by imposing the same
royalty rate on WCDMA 3G handsets as it does for CDMA2000 3G
handsets despite the fact that Qualcomm has contributed far less
technology to the WCDMA 3G standard than it has to the CDMA2000
standard.
The companies believe that Qualcomm's anti-competitive behaviour
has harmful effects for the mobile telecommunications sector in
Europe, as well as elsewhere, because carriers and consumers are
facing higher prices and fewer choices.
-Ends-
Enquiries
Brunswick
Joanna McDwyer +44 20 7404 5959
Richard Jacques +32 2 235 6511
Broadcom +1 949 926 5555
Bill Blanning
Ericsson +46 8719 1880
Peter Olofsson
NEC +44 20 8752 2794
Chris Shimizu
Nokia +358 7180 34900
Anne Eckert
Panasonic +44 20 8899 2217
Brendon Gore
Texas Instruments +1 214 480 6808
Gail Chandler
Company Statements
"Major telecommunications equipment companies on three
continents are standing up and saying that Qualcomm's business
practices are unfair, anticompetitive and ultimately
illegal.Qualcomm's illegal practices stifle competition and
ultimately hurt the consumer." David A. Dull, Senior Vice
President, Business Affairs; General Counsel; and Secretary,
Broadcom Corporation
"Qualcomm committed to standard setting organisations that it
would license its technology on fair, reasonable and
non-discriminatory terms. In spite of this and in breach of
competition law, Qualcomm is charging excessive and
disproportionate royalties. This means ultimately that consumers
may have to pay more than they should for their mobile handsets."
Kasim Alfalahi, Vice President IPR Licensing and Patents,
Ericsson AB
"Qualcomm's anti-competitive licensing practices and excessive
royalties are restricting innovation and the development of 3G
mobile telephony to the detriment of consumer choice."
Botaro Hirosaki, Senior Vice President, NEC
Corporation
"Intellectual property rights have an increasing role in
business. There are rules of law that apply to the licensing
business, and patentees and other intellectual property rights
owners cannot ignore them."Ilkka Rahnasto, Vice President,
Intellectual Property Rights, Nokia
Corporation
"Panasonic Mobile Communications believes that Qualcomm is
charging excessive and disproportional royalty rates in breach of
EU competition law and industry requirements to offer licenses for
essential patents on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory
terms."Haruo Suzuki, Director,Member of the Board,
Panasonic Mobile Communications Co. Ltd.
"Standards are established to guide the industry's technology
development and provide a healthy environment for innovation and
competition. We believe Qualcomm has abused its licensing position
in certain standards and has inhibited legitimate competition. If
this conduct goes unchecked, the risk is that consumers in Europe
and around the world will pay higher prices for mobile phones and
services and have less access to innovative products." Joe Hubach,
General Counsel, Texas Instruments Incorporated